Small and large hatch M4 Shermans
Composites (Hybrid)
Most
of the information on this page is courtesy of Joe DeMarco. Note: some of the
information on
this page was compiled using a
technique informally referred to as "counting heads."
It is based on the ongoing study of period documents and
photographs, as well as surviving Shermans. Due to the
limited nature of available reference
sources, some of the information presented here must be
considered as "educated guesswork."
The Chrysler Corporation
manufactured M4(75)s featuring cast front ends joined to welded rear hulls. The
US Army did not create a new designation in order to distinguish them from
completely welded hull M4s; officially, all of them were "Tank, Medium,
M4, 75mm, Dry." In period documents, such as unit rosters and even some
Ordnance Dept. Test Reports, these were frequently misidentified as M4A1s. For
convenience, we will use the popular term "M4 Composite." The British
designated them as "Sherman I Hybrid." Chrysler produced 1676 M4
Composites from August 1943 through January 1944.
Production
Order T-7903 : 580 tanks manufactured : Serial Number 44228 / USA 30100462 through S/N 44807 /
USA 30101041 (August-December 1943)
Production Order
T-7281: 698 tanks
manufactured:
Serial
Number 58623 / USA 3098789 through S/N 59320 / USA 3099486
(November 1943 -
January 1944)
Production Order T-10888 : 398 tanks manufactured : Serial Number 59321 / USA 3031184 through S/N 59718 /
USA 3031581 (December 1943 - January 1944)
In addition, evidence from surviving examples has
recently come to light which confirms that the American Locomotive Co. also
manufactured some M4s with Composite hulls. So far, the data suggests that
some or all of the tanks of the last ALCO Production Order were built
as large hatch Composites.
Production Order
T-4305: 300 tanks
manufactured:
Serial
Number 40305 / USA 3072902 through S/N 40604 / USA 3073201
(October -
December 1943)

The original Sherman design included both cast and welded upper hulls.
In the rush to increase production, it was noted that cast hulls could
be manufactured cheaper and faster than welded hulls, with "a large
saving of welding rod and labor." However, in October 1942, it was
concluded that while conversion to all cast hulls would be advantageous,
it was not feasible under the current industrial conditions. That is,
the number of US foundries capable of pouring such large castings was
limited. In that same month, the Ordnance Department in conjunction with
the Chrysler Corporation, began design work on a cast front end that
offered a partial solution to the higher cost of the all welded upper
hull, since the front is where a good deal of the welding man-hours were
spent. Also, the front casting as shown above, was a fraction of the
size of a complete cast hull, so could be produced by smaller capacity
foundries.
Prototypes were often made
using existing Shermans. In this case, Chrysler removed the original welded
front section and retrofitted their new casting. Note the the absence of
appliqué armor and gun travel lock, as well as the old style commander's blade
sight, and the earlier one piece differential housing.
A "photo op" showing "The First [sic] Chrysler Built M4 Tank
Shipped Aug 28th, 1943." This tank can be seen to be USA 30100471, so
while it may have been the first one shipped, we believe 30100462 was
the first one built. Many improvements and modifications were
beginning to filter into the Sherman production lines by August, and a
number of them can be seen on 30100471. Note the factory installation
of applique armor, gun travel lock with the corresponding "late" siren
position, late E8543 differential housing, and the recently introduced
"no pistol port" turret. Some light-colored tape appears on the
turret in the location of the 2-inch smoke mortar. Chrysler
is reported to have begun factory installing this item on 15 October
1943. If accurate, the tape might suggest that the smoke mortar hole
was machined out from the start in anticipation. Most
Chrysler Composites were built with periscope guards and bogies with
"upturned" return roller arms, whereas this early example lacks the
guards and has straight return roller arms.
Here we have a small hatch M4 Composite (SN 44256, September 1943
acceptance) on display at the National Guard Armory in Trenton,
Tennessee. It is one of only two known surviving examples. The other, SN
44255, is privately owned. The early front-end casting is similar in
appearance to the small hatch M4A1 but includes a pair of ventilators by
the drivers' hatches, such as were standard on welded hull M4s. The
protrusion on the right front was used as an antenna bracket on the M4
and M4 Composite, whereas it housed a ventilator on the M4A1. 44256 was
retrofitted with the
E9 modification. The "no pistol port turret"
is appropriate, but it is not original, as it was cast by Union Steel,
which was not a supplier to Chrysler. No doubt the turret and E9
suspension along with the commander's vision cupola were added during a
remanufacture in Spring 1945. The inset shows the casting marks in the
middle of the glacis. While the part number is only partially visible as
"E634X," period documents indicate that it was E6347. When appropriate,
we try to "count heads" using such marks but there are only 2 survivors
in this case. We can observe that both were cast by American Steel
Foundries-Granite City (G in an octagon), and that their part serial
numbers are B33 and B35. This suggests to us that ASF-G cast at least 35
E6347 front ends. Photo courtesy of
Paul and Lorén Hannah.
At present, "counting heads" evidence suggests that only about 50 small
hatch M4 Composites were produced. Consequently, there are very few
period photos of them. Above shows the one with the highest Registration
Number we can document - USA 30100510. This would have been accepted in
September 1943, overall, the 49th M4 Composite produced at the Detroit
Tank Arsenal. USA 30100510 was shipped to Aberdeen Proving Ground where
it was installed with the Multiple Rocket Launcher T34, nicknamed
"Calliope." The launcher was "capable of firing 60 4.5 inch rockets in a
period of 30 seconds." The photo was taken in late 1943, and the front
shot of this dramatic night scene was used on the cover page of APG's
"Sketchbook," their WW II souvenir history, even though Aberdeen
developed many things that were far more useful and effective than tank
mounted rocket launchers. History shows that these were, shall we say,
"not popular" with tankers who were ordered to mount them on their
Shermans. In any case, this M4 can be seen to have a low bustle turret
with the "thin spot" patch, with presumably a welded up pistol port on
the other side. Most Composites were built with "upturned" return roller
arms but here we see the earlier straight ones.
Above left, some of the crew of a small hatch Composite of the 499th
Armored Field Artillery Battalion, 14th Armored Division pose armed to
the teeth during the Tennessee Maneuvers in January 1944. Again, we see
the applique armor patch on the turret. A few Composites, both small and
large hatch, appear to have been produced with earlier D50878 turrets
with the "patches" and welded up pistol ports. At right is a rare
"combat shot" of a small hatch Composite, serving with the 40th Tank
Battalion, 7th Armored Division in Niedersorpe, Germany, April 7, 1945.
Note the "telltale" ventilators next to the drivers' hatches.
Unfortunately, not much else can be seen due to the extensive use of
camouflage, but this tank appears to have extended fenders, which
suggests it was a remanufactured unit. Although 75mm Shermans were no
longer "required" in the ETO, a number of remanufactured jobs were
shipped there in 1945 on an emergency basis to make up for losses
suffered during the Battle of the Bulge.
The 20th Armored Division was the last US armored division deployed to
the ETO, arriving in France on 17 February, 1945. Previous armored
divisions had been issued tanks when they arrived in theater, however
the 20th were instructed to bring their vehicles with them from the
States. Oddly, for this late stage of the war, the
vast majority of their tanks were not the army’s preferred
Ford GAA powered M4A3s, but rather Continental radial engined M4s &
M4A1s, many of these being older variants that had been remanufactured.
The two tanks seen here can be identified as small hatch Composites by
the ventilator (1) located on the shoulders of the tank’s hull,
and we point out to readers the distinctive twin drain holes
in the ventilator (2). On the left we see Pedro of the 27th Tank
Battalion, while on the right Cpl. Dale Ellis, the gunner of Petunia
II, stands next to his tank of the 2nd Platoon, B Company, 27th Tank
Battalion. The original Petunia is recorded as having been knocked out
by a German mine and was presumably one of the 17 medium tanks lost by
the 20th in its 8 days of combat. Most likely both of these tanks were
made with D50878 turrets with the "patches" (3) and welded up pistol
ports (4). Both have stowage modifications commonly seen in
the 20th Armored Division, such as field installed turret bustle
baskets, as well as extended fenders with the sand shields fitted
upside-down, creating stowage for jerry cans and machine gun ammo.
(Left side photo: author’s collection; right side photo courtesy
of Gary Ellis).
One of the deficiencies of the original Sherman design was the
hazardously small size of the drivers' hatches. In February 1943, larger
hatch dimensions were submitted, but it was found that "increased size
not possible of application to present hull design." Development work
was begun to reconfigure the front of the Sherman to accommodate larger
hatches. The new hatches were to be oval shaped and approximately 24
inches long and 19 inches wide. In comparison, the small drivers''
hatches of the original design were about 21 inches long and 16 inches
wide. Chrysler's cast front concept was used, and in May, the new
casting was attached to SN 30263, an April 1943 production Sherman
pulled off the line at Pullman Standard. This project was part of the
"ultimate" redesign of the Sherman, which also included the introduction
of a new 76mm turret as can be seen above, although the turret shown
here was characterized as "not according to print." By June, the
Ordnance Department determined that the "Chrysler front end" was an
acceptable solution and approved of making all subsequent welded hull
Shermans as large hatch Composites. However, in that same month, Fisher
Body submitted an alternate large hatch design that featured a single 2
1/2-inch glacis plate that was found to be ballistically superior. As a
result, the cast front concept was abandoned except at Chrysler which
had already made commitments and started production.
The
M4 Composites that began to roll off the lines in September 1943 were
the first "large hatch" Shermans of any type. Improvements were added as
they became available. Most of them appear to have been equipped with
the new "upturned" return roller arms (circled). In November, Chrysler
transitioned to the new high bustle D78461 turret that added a loader's
hatch and reintroduced the pistol port. This M4 is currently preserved
in a private collection in the US. While the hand crank may be a
reproduction, it is appropriate, since Chrysler appears to have
introduced the simplified one-piece design. Photos courtesy of
Mark Holloway.
Chrysler started M4A4
production using side armor plates that had nicely beveled top edges (left). In
July, 1943, the company transitioned to the use of square cut side armor
plates, a practice already employed by most of the other builders. It is
thought that, from August, 1943 to the end of production in June, 1945, all
Chrysler Shermans, including the M4 Composites, were built with square cut side
armor plates. Our example on the right, shows the Firefly Composite in
Klein-Willebroek, Belgium. Modelers might note that on M4 Composites and welded
hull M4s, the air scoops (1) are seen to sit ON TOP of the sponson plate,
whereas the holes on cast hull Shermans were machined out in such a way that
the scoops were flush mounted (inset).
At
the outset of production, Chrysler M4s were equipped with the "original
design" exhaust deflector (above left, but not a Composite). This had
been added to M4 and M4A1 models starting in the Spring of 1943. The
Barber-Colman Increased Air Flow System became available in late 1943,
and featured an improved exhaust deflector (1), along with "pyramid
turning vanes" (inset) over the air intake on the engine deck. The
"Freeze Date" on this item at Chrysler was Jan. 1, 1944, which, along
with a few period photos, suggests that it was installed on some of the
final Composites built in late 1943/early 1944.
It
would appear that Chrysler was supplied exclusively with the "square"
type of air cleaners. Surviving examples have been noted with an
identification and instruction plate from the "Vortox Mfg. Co.
Claremont, Ca. USA". The rear hull was constructed of armor plate with
an angled transition piece joining to the the belly plate (outlined in
red). Trailer towing pintles were standard on the Sherman series by the
time Chrysler began M4 production, but they don't appear to have been
factory installed on any of their Composites. Chrysler was directed to
install the pintles on M4A4s starting in April 1943, but it was found
that they bent up in service, making it impossible to open the engine
access doors. Consequently, "It was immediately burnt off as many new
tanks M4A4 as possible," and further installation was suspended. At the
changeover to M4 production, it is likely that Chrysler had trouble
finding a supplier for the pintles, so that the Government gave them a
temporary "pass." In any case, in period photos showing only the rear,
an M4 without a towing pintle is likely to be a Chrysler built
Composite. The M4 Composite at the RAAC Museum, Puckapunyal, is shown in
the photo on the right and is SN 59427, indicating December 1943
acceptance. We consider this tank to be a valuable reference as appears
to have been shipped to Australia "as built" and only slightly modified
during the course of its service. Note the fittings (circled) for the
Barber-Colman exhaust deflector. For future reference, we would observe
that it does not show evidence of ever having been installed with a
blanket roll rack.
Midway through their M3 Lee program, Chrysler
designed and introduced the pressed metal type of bogie wheel. They used
them throughout production on their VVSS equipped Shermans. Their distinctive
drive sprocket (right) was also employed throughout, including HVSS production.
All large hatch Shermans
had a U-shaped ventilator between the drivers' hatches as shown in the
photo on the left. The little "bump" (1) just below has a hole in its
face which served as drainage for any water that built up inside the
ventilator's ducting. The eyebolt (2) held a pair of chains that secured
the drivers' hatch padlocks. Pierre-Olivier measured a ventilator on an
M4 Composite and found it to be about 11 1/4 inches from the point
where the casting rises to form the turret splash to the front. The
width was about 11 1/2 inches and the width of the opening was roughly
an inch and a half.
The
front contours of the large hatch M4A1(76) were very similar to the
Composite's. However, the M4A1(76) was equipped with an additional
mushroom type ventilator next to the bow gunner's hatch (left) whereas
this area was blanked off on the Composites (right) and could serve as
an antenna location for a command tank.
M4 Composites were, and still are, often mistaken for M4A1s,
particularly in head on photos such as the one on the left above. If one
can see it, the little "nubbin" (asterisked) in the center of the
glacis is a sure indication of a Composite. Remanufactured tanks can be a
challenge when trying to determine the "as built" appearance. It was
noted that, 98% of the time, power trains did not require replacement,
but our example had its original replaced with one featuring a
three-piece differential housing. The tank was also retrofitted with the
E9 track modification, the modified M34 gun mount with "wing piece,"
commanders' vision cupola and the late armored housing for the gunner's
periscope.
This Signal Corps photo is dated 22 July 1944 with the location given as
Saipan. The caption reads, "This tank crew used 2″ bomb throwers for
protection to escape from enemy territory during the battle for the
island. L to R: Pvt. Michael Wietman, Brooklyn; Pfc. Earl E. Holman,
Nashville, Tenn.; Lt. Jack P. Lansford, Athens, Tenn.; and Cpl. John A.
Armstrong, Long Beach, Calif." Cpl. Armstrong is seen holding the 2-inch
smoke mortar that we assume he has removed from the turret. In his
right hand is one of the finned smoke bombs. While the caption provides
no unit identification, Lt. Lansford is listed in the records of the
762nd Tank Battalion as commander of the 1st Platoon of B Company. The
company was equipped with M4 Composites and was the only Medium Tank
Company of the 762nd that fought on Saipan. While not much else is
visible, Lt. Lansford is standing inside the loader's hatch, so we might
infer that it is a high bustle D78461 turret, introduced at Chrysler in
November 1943. The "Speed Number" is only partially visible on the
right front of the turret; we suspect Lt. Lansford's tank was "28." The
smoke mortar, a standard feature on the M4 Composite, was not popular
with US crews who found it to be "in the way" inside the cramped turret
(inset). Most preferred to fire smoke from the 75mm gun. When Japanese
infantry "swarmed" buttoned up Shermans, it was noted that they would
try to drop grenades or other explosives down the smoke mortar barrel.
The Marines reported that they fashioned wooden plugs to prevent this.
As a result of the negative feedback, in January 1945, the Ordnance
Department eliminated the smoke mortar from the Sherman design. In any
case, if the smoke mortar was actually used in battle by Lt. Lansford's
crew, it might have been on 7 July as B Company supported the 105th
Infantry Regiment of the 27th ID when the Japanese broke through their
lines in what is described as the "largest Banzai attack of the war."
Over 4300 Japanese soldiers were reported killed during this "last gasp"
attack.
Sand shields were mandated to
be factory installed by the time Chrysler began production. This seems a waste,
as most crews removed them. The little notch (item 1) seen on the sand shield
attachment strip, might serve as a minor recognition feature, as it appears to
have been exclusive to Chrysler's late production and remanufactured M4A4s, as
well as their M4 Composites. Our example shows a POA-CWS-H1 Flamethrower
Sherman of the 713th Tank Bn on Okinawa, June 1945. A Ronson flame gun replaced
the main armament, and was "hidden" inside the 75mm gun tube. Note
the overflow pipe emerging from the turret splash (item 2) - a Flamethrower
Sherman recognition feature.
The engine decks were in the
typical pre 1944 M4 / M4A1 configuration, where each of the four main fuel
tanks had its own filler nozzle. However, the Composites' engine deck lift
handles (circled in red) were oriented front to back rather than side to side. The pioneer tools
on our example are mounted in their "initial" positions. "Tokyo or Bust" of the 44th Tank Battalion
was photographed in action near Manila on March 10 1945.
M4 Composites were produced at the time when Shermans were most needed
overseas for the massive counter offensives planned for Europe and the
Pacific. The majority of them appear to have been sent to the US Army in
the Pacific Theater of Operations. The US employed them in much smaller
numbers in the European Theater. At present, we haven't been able to
find any photos of their use in US service in the Mediterranean Theater.
The Signal Corps photo above was reported to have been take during a
training exercise in the British Isles on 26 April 1944. The caption
identifies the tank commander as Sgt. George D. Vinyard of Poplar Bluff,
Missouri, but does not name his unit. The tactical markings (1) were
censored out except for "C[ompany]-10" (2). "
Find a Grave" has it that
SSgt. Vinyard died at age 26 on March 26, 1945. He is buried at
Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery in St. Louis, Missouri, and "69
Tank Bn, 6 Armd Div, World War II" is engraved on his headstone. Rest in
peace, SSgt. Vinyard. As for the tank, USA 30100929 would have been
accepted in October 1943. It can be seen to have a "no pistol port"
turret, and the "original design" exhaust deflector. The tools on the
upper rear hull plate reflect the "initial" configuration. About a month
later, the sledgehammer and wrench were relocated to the rearmost
section of the engine deck. Note the absence of tool or fittings on the
left rear sponson. From the standpoint of this piece, we would note that
period photos suggest that the 6th Armored Division was equipped with a
fair number of M4 Composites (as a subtype) after it arrived in the UK
in February 1944.
"China Clipper" was photographed in September 1944 while
undergoing repair at a workshop set up by the 6th Armored
Division’s 128th Ordnance Maintenance Battalion in a hangar at
Saulxures Airfield near Nancy, France. We could not quite get a
definitive read of the unit marking of this tank from the original
glossy print. It was either 68th or 69th Tank Battalion (inset). It
would appear that while in the UK before D-Day, the 6th AD directed
that their tanks carry a spare road wheel on the front.
“Counting heads” from period photos suggests that the road
wheel holder in a “T configuration,” as seen here, was
exclusive to the 69th Tank Battalion.
The tanks of the other TBs of the 6th AD, the 15th and the 68th, are
typically seen with the spare wheel on a straight steel rod secured
with a washer and nut. Of course a repaired tank was not necessarily
returned to its original crew, who may have drawn a replacement in the
interim. Again, we could not get a
definitive read of the Registration Number, but like 30100929 shown in
the previous caption, "China Clipper" has a "no pistol port" turret.
Period photos suggest that most of the M4 Composites shipped to Allied
Forces in Europe were equipped with the earlier turrets without
loader’s hatches. Chrysler manufactured its own power trains.
Throughout the M4A4 program, they had three piece differential
housings. At the outset of the M4 program, Chrysler PTs were
reconfigured with the late one-piece housings (Part Number E8543) as
seen here.
This Signal Corps photo is dated 14 April 1945 and captioned, "With the
(148th Inf. Regt., 37th Div., Monglo, Luzon, P.I.) Mine sweepers are
shown moving ahead of the tanks to check for land mines, etc., along
road to (Baguio)." [It is assumed that the units and locations were put
in parentheses for possible censorship.] Monglo is a village less than
10 miles northwest of the City of Baguio, the headquarters of General
Tomoyuki Yamashita's Fourteenth Area Army. The caption does not identify
the tank's unit, but the "triangle inside a circle" symbol (circled)
appears in some other SC photos where the unit is identified as the
775th Tank Battalion. The "Unit History" of the 775th that we have
available is somewhat terse, but report that in April, B Company, "less
the 1st platoon...were attached to the 37th Infantry Division to move on
Baguio." The history states that on 24 April, "tanks and crews from
this Battalion were the first American troops to enter BAGUIO."
Regarding the tank, blanket roll racks (1) were standard equipment on
the "ultimate design" Shermans. As yet, it can't be confirmed if the
racks were ever factory installed on Composites. This modification was
charged to Tank Depots starting in late December 1943, however, the
modification kit also included parts for the AA Machine Gun stowage on
the turret bustle, which is not present on this unit. It is thought that
the sledgehammer and wrench were relocated to the rearmost section of
the engine deck as seen here, with, or in anticipation of, the
introduction of the blanket roll rack. Another item of interest is the
"quick release towing shackle with handle" (2). These had been installed
on the front from the outset, while the rear continued in the original
Sherman configuration. The quick release required double towing lugs;
the doubles show up on the rear of only a small number of period photos
of Chrysler Composites, but on no surviving examples that we have
encountered so far. Note that this tank can be seen with a fitting (3)
on the engine access door that held the Barber-Colman type exhaust
deflector. As mentioned previously, the "Freeze Date" [that is, "No tank
without this item accepted after..."] at Chrysler is listed as 1/1/44.
Available evidence suggests that it was installed on some of the final
Composites built in late 1943/early 1944.
Meanwhile, to the east of Baguio, the 1st Platoon of B Company was
attached to the 128th Infantry Regiment, 32nd Infantry Division in late
March 1945. The combat team was ordered to push its way up a narrow path
through the Caraballo Mountains known as the Villa Verde Trail.
Salacsac Pass No. 2 was a particular chokepoint, and elements of the
32nd ID fought there nearly to exhaustion from 5 March through 17 April
before the pass was cleared. The photo above is dated 3 April 1945, and
captioned in part, "CO of (1st Plat, Co B, 775th Tank Bn), Lt. Jack
Beltz personally guides one of his tanks around a sharp curve high in
the (Villa Verde Trail, Luzon)." As mentioned, the "Unit History" of the
775th Tank Battalion is very terse. Its description of the activities
of the 1st Platoon of B Company: "The platoon spent nearly two months in
the mountain with their tanks accomplishing unbelievable tasks in
climbing 60 degree slopes and building roads. This platoon fought along
the Villa Verde Trail until junction was made with the 25th Division at
Santa Fe [ca. 28 May 1945]." We haven't been able to determine the
composition of the 1st Platoon, but, in general, at full strength a
platoon consisted of 4 or 5 tanks. The mention of "building roads" would
suggest that perhaps the 1st Platoon may have had a dozer Sherman. In
any case, the full photo provides a dramatic view of the nature of the
precipitous terrain, but we have cropped it in order to focus on the
tank, which appears to have "B-3" (1) painted on the driver's side of
the differential housing. A four-leaf clover type symbol (2) can be seen
painted on the rear with the number "3" in the top left leaf. Although
it's not totally clear, close examination of the photo suggests that the
tank may be named "Battle Baby" (3). Photos of the 775's M4s
consistently show them with a spare road wheel (4) mounted on the front,
and 5 spare track links (5) mounted on each side of the turret.
This photo is also dated 3 April 1945 and shows the same M4 Composite
judging by the identical arrangement of the crew's "stuff." The caption
reads, "US tank climbs a hill which is stated to have a grade not less
than 60 [degrees] on the (Villa Verde Trail, Luzon, PI). The tank was
used to draw enemy fire and thus locate their positions. The hill was
4700 feet above sea level, the highest a tank has been in SWPA
[Southwest Pacific Area]." We have not cropped the photo so that readers
can see the incredible vista. Note the "triangle inside a circle"
symbol painted on the differential housing on the bow gunner's side (inset).
There appears to be a shotgun laying across the feet of the gun travel
lock. In a post combat Q & A, it was noted that the 775th did not
use the .50 caliber anti-aircraft machine gun provided with their
Shermans. In fact, they removed them and put them in storage. This
enabled the crews to carry more .30 caliber ammunition since they found
the .30 caliber machine guns more
useful due to their higher rate of fire. The second inset is another photo of
the tank taken from above, "showing how far the tank would drop if it
slipped off the trail. The tank did slip on the soft shoulder and had to
be pulled back by another tank." So, we know that there were at least
two tanks in the platoon. The overhead view shows that this M4 had a low
bustle turret without a loader's hatch.
In 2023 Jim Goetz visited an M4 Composite that appears to have been a
casualty of the Battle of the Villa Verde Trail. It sits at the Mangili
Tindaan Historical Nature Park near Salacsac Pass No. 2 on a peak that
the locals call "Tangke." Jim found the serial number 59284 stamped into
the hull wall next to the dataplate frame (inset 1) as well as on the
rear towing lugs, indicating that it was accepted in December 1943, and
would have been assigned USA 3099450 according to our calculations.
There is no evidence that the tank was penetrated, but there are
indications that it burned. Jim interviewed the proprietor who showed
him copies of the same Signal Corps photos that we have featured in the
two previous captions. She seemed to be under the impression that "her"
tank is B-3. However, SN 59284 has the later D78461 high bustle turret
with loader's hatch and pistol port, whereas B-3 can be seen to have had
a low bustle turret without a loader's hatch. The proprietor mentioned
that the brother of a Japanese soldier visited the site in 2007. The
soldier reportedly attacked the tank with a gasoline bomb, killing all
five of the crew. It certainly seems possible that SN 59284 was
destroyed by fire and left in place on top of the mountain after being
stripped of useable parts. Unfortunately, the "Unit History" of the
775th TB does not go into any detail regarding their losses of men and
tanks. The Medium Companies listed 11 men Killed in Action with 8 of
those in B Company. Tank losses are reported as 4 totally destroyed,
with 34 "damaged and returned to service." Whatever happened to SN 59284
certainly warrants a deeper dive into the history, if any readers would
be in the position to assist. Regarding the tank, Jim could not discern
any tactical markings on the differential housing that might aid in
identifying the unit or tank number. We would judge that the "nubbin"
(circled) once held a threaded rod for a spare road wheel, typically
seen on the 775th's Shermans.
In order to focus on the tank, we have cropped this Signal Corps photo
of "Brassierless Baby," another B Company, 775th TB M4. This Sherman was
filmed on the outskirts of Baguio, 27 April 1945, so likely would have
been part of B Company, "less the 1st platoon...attached to the 37th
Infantry Division to move on Baguio." What caught our eye is that the
gun travel lock (1) has been broken off in a manner similar to what is
seen on SN 59284 in the previous photo. This made us wonder if they
could be the same tank, but we had been able to examine the original
Signal Corps print with a magnifying glass and got a partial read of the
USA Registration Number of "303147X." As mentioned, SN 59284 would have
been assigned USA 3099450 according to our calculations, so no match
there. We hope to unearth more "who, what, where, when" details about
the destruction of SN 59284, but suspect it had already been KO'd when
the photo of "Brassierless Baby" was taken on 27 April 1945. "BB" can be
seen with the "triangle inside a circle" symbol (2) as well as some
sort of tactical symbol that we take to be a palm frond (3) with the
number "4" painted on it. Also visible is the threaded rod (4) that held
the spare road wheel. The crew have named the 75mm gun "Big Mike."
In this view of SN 59284, it can be seen that there is no rubber on the
road wheels. The rubber often burned off the wheels during catastrophic
tank fires. On the other hand, the rubber could have delaminated over
the years or could have been salvaged like so many other items from this
tank including the engine and engine decks. The number "775" (outlined)
is faintly visible, although photos suggest that a "triangle inside a
circle" was used to identify the battalion in lieu of "775 delta."
Various weld scars including those from the "Upper Attaching Angle" (1)
indicate that this tank had once been installed with the deep water
fording modification. Also, evident are hinge bits and weld scars (2)
suggesting that the vehicle once had a blanket roll rack. The "W inside a
C" (3) casting mark on the turret bustle indicates that this D78461
turret was produced by Continental-Wheeling, one of Chrysler's major
turret suppliers. Their turrets appear to have had the lifting rings
mounted a few inches higher than observed on some other D78461 castings.
Jim
visited another M4 Composite at the Philippine Military Academy in
Baguio. He recorded the Serial Number 59440 from the rear tow lugs,
indicating that it was accepted in December 1943, and would have been
assigned USA 3031303. This tank was modified at some point by the
addition of the "commander's vision cupola" (1). This Modification Work
Order was released in September 1944, but it seems to have been greatly
delayed, since it doesn't appear to have been available for field
retrofit until very late in the war. The kit included a pedestal mount
(2) for the .50 caliber anti-aircraft machine gun along with a traveling
clip (inset) for the gun's barrel, although there is no weld scar
evidence that the clip was ever installed on this example. Note the
flush mounting of the smoke mortar barrel (3) typical of Chrysler M4
Composites and the fittings for the spot and signal light (4). These
items were ordered to be removed in early 1945. We consider surviving
Shermans that still have them intact, such as 59440, to be in "WW II
configuration."
Most of the Shermans that took part in the Pacific Campaigns were
waterproofed and installed with deep water fording stacks, since it was
expected that they would have to wade ashore during the amphibious
assaults on the various islands. In this view, one can see the vestiges
of the sheet metal pieces that would have enclosed the lower rear hull
in order to protect the air cleaners and engine access doors from water
damage. The inset at the top left is from the "Preparation of Ordnance
Materiel for Deep Water Fording" manual and shows the assembly of some
of these parts. The Composite was built with a notched in upper rear
hull plate. It can be seen how a rectangular "Upper Attaching Angle" was
welded on (1) as part of the process. This piece covered over the
indent so that the lower edge ran straight across. The inset at the top
right shows the complete installation of the stacks on USA 3031428,
built about 125 units after our subject. As soon as possible after
landing, "De-waterproofing Stations" were established so that the tanks
could have the wading gear and sealants removed permitting them to run
cooler and fight more efficiently. Period photos show that in some
cases, the "Upper Attaching Angle" was not removed so that the lower
edge of the upper rear hull plate appears to run straight across like a
Second Generation M4. Note that 59440 has the fittings (2) on the engine
access doors that held the Barber-Colman type exhaust deflector. There
are no visible weld scars that would indicate that this unit had ever
been installed with a blanket roll rack. This D78461 turret was cast by
Continental-Hubbard (H inside a C). Note the lower position of the
turret lifting rings compared with the Continental-Wheeling turret on SN
59284.
"Another Dinah" USA 3099241 (above left) of the 763rd Tank Battalion
was photographed on Okinawa in April 1945. By the Registration
Number, this tank would have been about the 1026th Chrysler M4
and would have been accepted in November 1943. Our "counting
heads" method suggests that this was about the introduction point of
the high bustle D78461 turret, i.e., about 1000 units would
have been made with "no pistol port" D50878 turrets. In general, the
introduction of changes was "with obsolescence." As the new parts began
to enter production, the manufacturer continued to use the old parts
until the supply was exhausted. So, for instance, another A Co. 763rd
M4, USA 3099276 (above right), built 35 units later, is installed with
the earlier, low bustle turret. USA 3099276 can be seen as an example
where the "Upper Attaching Angle" (1) was not removed when the
tank was de-waterproofed, so that the lower edge of the upper rear
hull plate appears to run straight across.
A pair of M4s of the 706th Tank Battalion in action in Agana, Guam, 2
August 1944. The lead tank "Cognac" can be seen to be USA 3099305,
indicating December 1943 acceptance. "Counting heads" suggests that this
was about the point where the supply of low bustle turrets must have
been exhausted. Note that "Cognac" has the crowbar mounted on the left
rear sponson whereas the trailing tank "Cupid" does not. The crowbar
appears to have been repositioned from the right to the left sponson in
November, probably coincident with the relocation of the wrench and
sledgehammer. "Cupid" which can be seen in a few period photos as USA
3099165 (November 1943), was likely one of the last to be built with the
tools in their original locations. Note that both tanks have spare
track links on their front fenders.
This well-known Marine Corps photo is undated and is captioned in part,
"The Crews Were Saved - enemy anti-tank guns accounted for these two VS
[sic...US] tanks burning near Yigo, Guam..." The Battle of Yigo was the
last in the Guam Campaign. The 706th Tank Battalion's After Action
Report states that Company C lost two tanks and suffered 6 casualties on
7 August 1944. Based on the same "blotch" patterns as seen in the
previous photo, the Composite in the foreground is Cupid. The paint of
"Speed Number" 751 on the turret (1) is burning away in the intense
fire. A pair of track links (2) can be observed on the left front
fender. The M4 in the background appears to be named "Champagne" (3) and
"C-13" (4) can be made out on the right side of the upper rear hull
plate. Like Cupid, Champagne has a no pistol port turret and pioneer
tools in the "initial" configuration. Note the remains of wading stack
fittings (5). We could not get a good read of Champagne's Registration
Number, but based on her appearance, an educated guess would be USA
3099056. Like SN 59284 on the Villa Verde Trail, these tanks were left
in place as sort of informal monuments. Cupid was
photographed as late
as 1954 but seems to have "disappeared" sometime after that.
Champagne without turret was
photographed as late as "circa 1965"
and then it too was gone. We can only assume they were scrapped since
neither is in the collection of Guam's Pacific War Museum.
The photo above was taken
in late July 1945 at the Manila Supply Depot. It shows a few Composites along
with some "new" remanufactured M4A1(75)s. "Bloodthirsty"
appears to be a combat veteran Sherman of the 44th Tank Battalion. The Registration Number is USA 30100748, indicating September
1943 acceptance. We've pointed out the "cast in thickened cheek,"
typical of D50878 "no pistol port" turrets as well as the later
D78461s. The commander's cupola has the positive hatch lock mechanisms that
were added to Shermans starting in the Spring of 1943. These were replaced by
"turret hatch D69993 with equilabrator," which can be seen on the M4
in the foreground. The improved hatches had integral springs on the hinges, and
appear to have entered the production lines at Chrysler in November.
On the left, an M4 Sherman named "Hot Box" is shown as it "leaves LSM in
unloading test into 6 feet of water off Los Negros Island." The water
level seems to be more like 6 inches, so this appears to be a "dry"
landing. Or, judging by the rearward focus of the men on the tank, we
suspect it is actually backing into the LSM. The caption of the photo on
the right specifically identifies "Hot Box" as "Co A, 44th Tank Bn."
Period photos indicate that Company A's Shermans were decorated with a
wolf's head cartoon (1). The single horizontal line seen here (2) is
thought to have been a tactical marking that denoted the first platoon,
while "Bloodthirsty" shown in the previous caption with 3 lines suggests
it was in the third platoon of Company A. In the 44th TB, tank names
obviously did not have to begin with the letter of the Company as was a
common practice with US tank units. An LSM
[Landing Ship Medium] could carry 5 medium tanks and a few tactical vehicles on its deck.
The caption of the right-side photo is dated 8 October 1944 and
it is thought that it shows the 5 M4 Composites that made up the 1st
Platoon of Company A preparing to load aboard LSM 258 for Operation King
II, the invasion of Leyte Island in the Philippines. Most of the Tank
Battalions in the Pacific Theater of Operations had wading trunks
installed on their tanks before an amphibious landing. However, photos
of the Shermans of Companies A and B of the 44th do not show evidence of
having been equipped with deep water fording kits. Probably the most
that was done was that the belly plates and rear engine access doors
were sealed for shallow wading of 2 or 3 feet. Of interest is that "Hot
Box" is one of the few large hatch Composites observed with an earlier
low bustle D50878 turret with the "thin spot" patch (3). Presumably, the
pistol port was welded up, but of course it can't be seen in these
photos. Company A landed at Leyte on "A" Day, 20 October 1944, and had
its combat debut on "A plus 6." It supported elements of the 1st
Cavalry, 24th Infantry and 32nd Infantry Divisions from 26 October
through 15 December. Company A is reported to have "inflicted heavy
casualties, including enemy infantry, armor and artillery. Their own
casualties were five men wounded in action...one man killed in action
(acting company commander), one tank destroyed by enemy action, and one
tank destroyed by own forces to prevent falling into enemy hands."
During WW II,
LSM 258 is reported to have survived "dozens of
kamikaze attacks and five major beachhead invasions."
Another view of
the Manila Supply Depot which shows some of
the remanufactured Shermans. Note the various
later features such as all round vision cupolas,
gunner’s armored periscope covers, commander's
vane sights, and .50 cal MG stowage on the turret bustle, typical
of remanufactured tanks. Despite the updates, these tanks were obsolete
in the sense that they would not have been wanted for the planned
Invasion of Japan, which required that all of the Shermans be M4A3
models with HVSS. We have included this photo since the third tank
from the front is a rare small hatch Composite, as
evidenced by the ventilator on the hull shoulder of the cast front
end. Also of interest, is that the sixth tank in can be seen with
a "hole" (arrow) in the drive sprocket, indicative of the
E9 suspension
modification.
The
British/Commonwealth received over 2000 M4(75)s as Lend Lease. These
were allocated to them from September 1943 through May 1944. While the
US made no distinction between welded hull and composite hull M4s, the
British did, and labeled them “Sherman I” and “Sherman I Hybrid”
respectively. Only a few period photos show “Sherman I Hybrid” 75mm gun
tanks in Commonwealth service in both the ETO and MTO. The Imperial War
Museum photo above is dated 29 June 1944, and captioned "Troops dig in
beside a Sherman tank nr. Rauray to consolidate the ground they have
gained. Troops of 49th Div. Rauray between Tilly and Caen." It is
thought that the Sherman would have served with one of the units of the
8th Armoured Brigade, who were in support of the 49th Infantry Division
during the heavy fighting in the Caen sector at the time. The British
War Department Number is T-263137, and the tank's turret can be seen as a
low bustle D50878 with no pistol port, the most prevalent turret type
used on the M4 Composite. Courtesy of the Imperial War Museum,
Photo
B6225.
Wartime photos of "Sherman Ic Hybrids," the British designation
for Firefly conversions based on the M4 Composite, are far more common.
The January to June 1945 “Half Yearly Report on the Progress of the
Royal Armoured Corps” states that “3,260 [Fireflies were] ordered and
2,139 produced by 31st May 1945.” Thus, it would appear that total
Firefly production amounted to 2139, since “No further conversions will
be carried out as there is no requirement for this vehicle in the Far
East.” The production documents refer to the conversions generically as
“Sherman 17 pdr.” Unfortunately, there is no breakdown of the model
types, such as Sherman I (M4), Sherman I Hybrid (M4 Composite) or
Sherman V (M4A4). In period photos, M4 Composite and M4A4 based
Fireflies seem to be represented in about roughly equal numbers, while
all welded hull M4 based Fireflies appear less frequently. The M4A1 was
not acceptable for Firefly conversion because the rounded contours of
the cast hull could not accommodate the arrangement of the Firefly's
interior stowage. Despite the cast front end, this was obviously not an
issue with the Composites, and one of the converting firms mentioned
that those with the D78461 turrets saved them a lot of time and effort
since they already had loader's hatches. Above shows such a turret on a
Sherman Ic Hybrid of the Sherwood Rangers, 8th Armoured Brigade
photographed in Geldern, Germany, 6 March, 1945. Courtesy of the
Imperial War Museum, Photo
B 15230.
Most
surviving M4 Composites in Europe are Firefly conversions (Sherman 1c
Hybrid), such Serial Number 44434 (October 1943) on display in
Klein-Willebroek, Belgium. It can be seen to have an earlier D50878 low
bustle turret with applique armor and a welded up pistol port. This
strikes us as a real Firefly turret, although we have not seen another
example where the pistol port hatch hinge pins (inset, arrows) were
retained when the assembly was welded up. In any case, one
of the reasons for the introduction of the high bustle D78461 turret,
is that the low bustle was stated to have caused some interference
issues when mounted on large hatch Shermans. However, the majority of
large hatch Composites were produced with low bustle turrets, and we
have found no historical records that reported this as a problem.
In October 1948, VVSS models of the M4, 75/105mm, and M4A1, 75mm were
classified as "Limited Standard" with the note that they were
"unsuitable for meeting U.S. requirements but satisfactory for meeting
foreign-aid requirements." Even so, a few such types were sent from
Japan to Korea in the early days of the Korean Conflict. The above shows
USA 3099372, a December 1943 Chrysler M4 Composite photographed at
Masan in September 1950. This tank, which we suspect served with the
89th Medium Tank Battalion shows a number of the stowage modifications
typical of the Tokyo Ordnance Depot, such as the spare bogie wheel on
the turret and spare drive sprockets and track links on the hull sides.
The Tokyo OD may have refurbished the tank and fitted it with an M1
Dozer Blade, an item that was in high demand in Korea. It is thought
that the few non M4A3 HVSS Shermans seen in photos during the Korean
War, would have been replaced eventually, so 3099372 was most likely one
of the last M4 Composites to serve with the US Army.
Since VVSS models of the M4 with 75mm
were considered "satisfactory for meeting foreign-aid requirements," it
stands to reason that a few M4 Composites were distributed to Allied
countries as part of the Mutual Defense Assistance Program [MDAP].
Brazil was reported to have been shipped 22 "Tank, Medium, 75mm Gun, M4
Series" up to 31 January 1954. Period photos show that some of these
were M4 Composites. The image above is dated 1957 and shows
"Brazilian M4 Sherman tanks on maneuvers in Rio de Janeiro." The
Brazilian MDAP M4s seen in this and other photos are characterized by
certain upgrades, the most obvious of which was the commander's vision
cupola (1). These particular tanks were also retrofitted with armored
first aid boxes (2). The T-shaped towing shackles (3) appear to have
been introduced in Sherman production in October 1944, well after
Composite production had ended in January 1944. So, we would consider
them to be retrofits. The
lead tank is seen with extended end connectors (4). These had gone out
of production in 1945 and would not have been available for universal
installation to VVSS Shermans during the remanufacturing/reconditioning
programs of the late 1940s/early 1950s. Thus, EECs appear somewhat
randomly on such Shermans. We can't
help but wonder if some of these tanks had not been shipped back from
dumps in the Pacific after the end of World War II. Many of the
Brazilian MDAP M4s are noted to have a rather large "comb" device (5)
affixed to the differential housing below the bow machine gun.
More than one of the surviving
Brazilian Composites has been noted to have had the USA Registration
Number stamped into the right front of the E6289 casting as pointed out
above. In this case, it is 3031184. We suspect this may have been done
by the firm Brown and Root of Houston when they reconditioned and/or
processed these tanks for MDAP issue. Our correspondent recorded the
Serial Number from one of the rear towing lugs as "59321" (inset).
Thus, this M4 on display at the Military Academy in Resende,
Brazil, has what we rarely find on a surviving Sherman - one with
a known good Serial and Registration Number together. By our reckoning,
SN 59231/USA 3031184 would have been accepted in December 1943, and
would have been the first unit built on Chrysler's final M4 Composite
Production Order T-10888. (The Order was cut back to 398 M4s, and the
rest of the Production Order was converted over to the manufacture
of 853 MA3(76)s.) Just visible is the large "comb" device
(circled) affixed to the differential housing below the bow machine
gun. Photos and information courtesy of Colonel Renato Rocha.
Pierre-Olivier encountered another M4 Composite with the "big comb" (top
inset) at a restoration facility in France. We take the presence of
this particular type of comb to be an indication of a Sherman
reconditioned and processed for MDAP shipment in the early 1950s.
Another indication is the stamping of the USA Registration Number on the
right front. In this instance, it is 3099392 (bottom inset) denoting
December 1943 production. As mentioned, our guess is that this stamping
(plus the "big comb") was
done by Brown and Root. Some MDAP countries were supplied with
"Bulldozer, Tank, Mounting" kits of various types. The fittings seen
here appear to correspond to the M1 series dozer, widely used during WW
II. The oddest thing about this M4 is that it was converted to 105
howitzer configuration. While this tank's original turret was very
likely a high bustle D78461, it was obviously exchanged for another
D78461 turret of much later production as evidenced by the “bump out”
(1) added to better accommodate the commander's vision cupola and noted
on turrets cast from November 1944 onward. The turret is missing the 105
gun mount, but it can be seen with a variation of the late style of 105
dust cover fittings (2). Present, but unseen here, is the additional
ventilator on the turret "roof" exclusive to 105mm Shermans. Finally,
this tank was retrofitted with a "tall" gun travel lock (3) used on 76mm
and 105mm Shermans. Note the post war 1-piece clasp (4). The weld scars
(5) from the tanks' original "short" 75mm gun travel lock are clearly
visible.
With Shermans, we never know when or where we might come across some
heretofore "hidden" object. Pierre-Olivier was able to look around
inside USA 3099392, and it was the first time he/we had encountered a
105mm turret that had the power traverse mechanism “shoehorned in in the
rear." From left to right is the "turret traversing hydraulic pump"
(1), the "turret traversing electric motor" (2) and the "hydraulic oil
reservoir" (3). The decision to omit power traverse on the 105 Sherman
design was the subject of many complaints from the using arms. Had it
been installed from the start, 105 mm Shermans may have been used more
aggressively, and merited the name “assault gun.” The Ordnance
Department agreed to add it, and power traverse was finally introduced
into production around mid-March 1945, too late for use during WW II. It
had to be “shoehorned in in the rear" as seen here, and we can’t help
but think that the addition of these components only exacerbated the
already cramped crew conditions inside the small turret. Other objects
seen here include the radio shelf (4), part of the ducting for the rear
ventilator (5), and the support for the commander’s seat (6).
Someone expended a great deal of effort converting this M4 to 105mm
configuration, and the conversion appears to have been done with
accuracy. That is to say that 105 ammunition bins were retrofitted to
replace the original 75 mm bins, and to our eyes, they appear to have
been installed "by the book." The 105 Shermans were the only
Second-Generation models that did NOT include wet stowage for the 66
rounds carried. Also, unlike wet stowage Shermans, not all of the rounds
were repositioned off of the sponsons, mainly to the floor of the hull
(1). The size of the rounds more or less "forced" 21 of them to be
stored in a pair of bins on the right-side sponson. The forward bin (2)
held 9 rounds, while the rear bin (3) held 12. We would note that no
provision was made for external appliqué plates to further protect the
sponson stowed ammo as on other dry stowage Shermans. But, of course, as
an M4 Composite, 3099392 was built with the applique plates factory
installed. This tank was reported to have been acquired from
Israel, and at first, we were thinking the modifications might have been
done there, since they were quite adept at changing and upgrading
Shermans to suit their needs.
On a subsequent visit, the staff showed P-O the dataplate from this
tank. It is one of those generic plates noted on some post war
remanufactured Shermans. The only thing stamped into the blank spaces
was the Serial Number 59226, which is an exact mathematical match to the
Registration Number 3099392 found stamped on the right front of the
hull. There is nothing stamped to indicate the manufacturer or the
production date and no inspector's initials. Of greatest interest is
that the nomenclature "preprinted" across the top of the plate is "TANK,
MEDIUM, M4 105 MM HOWITZER," which suggests that this Composite was
purposefully converted to M4(105) in the US. That strikes us as odd
since 105mm Shermans were over produced during WW II, and there were
plenty of them available postwar for distribution as MDAP. For
instance, there were 2695 Sherman 105s reported in the US inventory in
1948, including 776 M4(105)s. On the other hand, many uses were found
for these tanks. Some, perhaps around 400, were distributed as straight
105mm Shermans. The hulls and turrets of others were used in
the M4A1E6 and M4A3E4 conversion programs. Counting
heads suggests that over 1000 M4A3(105)s were converted to M74 Tank
Recovery Vehicles. It is just hard to imagine that this conversion
needed to be done to satisfy an MDAP 105mm requirement, but there it is.
France was by far the largest MDAP recipient of "Tank, Medium, 105mm
How, M4 Series" at 230 units, so perhaps the Israelis got this odd duck
from them? In any case, we are told that this tank will be restored back
to a WW II era M4 Composite with 75mm gun.
It might be appropriate here to observe that the
Second Generation M4(105) pilot tank was built using a Composite hull,
even though it had been decided that production 105s would be assembled
using the welded “Fisher Front End,” since it had been found to be
superior to the cast “Chrysler Front End” seen here. The pilot has
survived and is on display at historic Ft. Wayne in Detroit, Michigan.
The serial number, recorded from the rear tow lugs is 44272. That is an
exact mathematical match to USA 30100506 which has been noted in period
documents and photos of the test tank. SN 44272 would have been accepted
in September 1943, overall, the 45th M4 Composite made at the Detroit
Tank Arsenal, and possibly one of the first assembled with the E6289
front casting with large drivers' hatches, a major feature of Second
Generation Shermans. Photo courtesy of
Lorén and Paul Hannah.
The only other type of Sherman built in the Composite configuration was
the M4A6. This was powered by a radial diesel that was even more massive
than the multibank engine of the M4A4. Consequently, the M4A6 was
assembled by marrying the large hatch cast front to the M4A4's longer
hull. Although the initial contract called for 775 units, it was cut
back to only 75, as the Government determined instead to increase
production of Shermans powered by the Ford V8 engine. M4A6 production
ran from October 1943 to February 1944. Serial and Registration Numbers
assigned appear to have been Serial Number 43453/USA 3099687 through S/N
43527/USA 3099761. To date, no surviving examples have come to light.
Chrysler built Shermans have been observed to have the Tank's Ordnance
Serial Number stamped into both of the rear towing lugs. Should any
readers have the opportunity to examine a surviving M4 Composite, we
would greatly appreciate a report.
Some Chrysler built M4 Composites have been seen to have the Serial
Number stamped in the driver's compartment, about 6 inches (15
centimeters) to the left of the dataplate or dataplate frame.
Along
with the tank's serial number, we try to record the data about the
large hatch front casting - Part Number E6289. The casting information
can be seen on the top of the hull, just behind the driver's hatch. Most
of the examples examined have caster's logos indicating that they were
produced by the American Steel Foundries East Chicago, Indiana plant as
shown on the left above. These have been seen to have part serial
numbers with an "A" prefix. A few others have been noted with
ASF-Granite City, Illinois logos, with "B" prefix serial numbers. The
photos show the highest A and B prefix serial numbers we have recorded
A1481 and B651. To our way of thinking, these numbers suggest that at
least 2132 of the E6289 casting were produced. Chrysler manufactured
around 1700 large hatch Composites, both M4s and M4A6s. So, we have over
400 extra castings. Although the historical documentation is pretty
"emphatic" that only Chrysler made Composite hull Shermans, a few
surviving examples have revealed to us that the American Locomotive
Company (ALCO) produced some as well, most likely using front castings
that became excess after Chrysler's M4 and M4A6 contracts were
terminated. This was somewhat unexpected since the incorporation of
larger hatches was not stated to have applied to the companies that were
leaving the Sherman program by the end of 1943: ALCO, Baldwin, Federal
Machine, Ford, Lima, Pacific Car, and Pullman. At present, the
"discovery" of surviving non-Chrysler Composites has been limited to
ALCO, but one never knows.
Years ago, we corresponded with a gentleman in South Africa concerning
the M4 Composite Firefly (Hybrid Ic) on display at the Museum of
Military History in Johannesburg. He sent us a Xerox copy image of the
dataplate (inset, top left) which showed that the tank had been "M'F'D
BY AMERICAN LOCOMOTIVE COMPANY." The Firefly had an ALCO not Chrysler
Serial Number - 40319. We didn't know what to make of this ALCO M4
Composite at the time, and asked our correspondent to see if he could
find the Serial Number on the rear towing lugs in order to confirm that
it matched the SN on the dataplate. However, it wasn't until 2020 when Pierre-Olivier visited the Museum
that the Serial Number on the left tow was "revealed" as 40319 (inset,
bottom left) the same as on the
dataplate. This tank appears to have been part of a "consent to
retransfer" approved by the US Lend Lease Administrator on 3 January
1947. War materiel from U.K Military Holdings in Italy was permitted to
be provided and shipped to South Africa. The original agreement included
98 Shermans of various types and 24 M10 Gun Motor Carriages. SN 40319
can be seen with T-263727 painted on. We suspect that that is the
original British War Department Number, since it is listed as a "Sherman
M4 (1C) on a "Nominal Roll of Tractors and Tanks, 1 Special Service Bn,
Potchefstroom, South Africa, 31 March 1948" provided by author William
Marshall.
During a Sherman spotting tour in South America in November 2013, our
peripatetic friend Jim Goetz examined a pair of M4 Composites that have
Serial Numbers that were assigned to the final Production Order of the
American Locomotive Co. These tanks are former British Firefly
conversions that were purchased by Argentina from Commonwealth tank
dumps in Belgium in the late 1940s. The Argentinians re-engined and up
gunned many of their Shermans and labeled them "Repotenciados." Jim was
not permitted to photograph the Composite and welded hull M4 on display
in Asuncion, Paraguay, since they may have still been in service
at the time, but he was able to look at the Composite and noted that the
Serial Number was 40351. Jim recorded the Serial Number from the left
rear tow lug of the one in Olavarria, Argentina (pictured above) as
40313. These findings enabled us to build up a little weight of evidence
that the ALCO M4 Composite was actually a "thing."
Jim examined other South American M4 Composite
Repotenciados that had Chrysler Serial Numbers. It is to be noted that, on the
few ALCO all welded hull M4s we have examined, the serial numbers are stamped
"one on top of the other," and only on the left rear tow lug. That is
what Jim found on the ALCO built Composites, such as seen with 40351 above
left. On the other hand, Chrysler serial number stampings have been noted to be
oriented "side by side," and present on both rear tow lugs. The
Chrysler orientation can be seen on the right above, from the Repotenciado on
display in Cordoba, Argentina. Also of note is that the two Composites with
ALCO serial numbers were seen to have double rear towing lugs, whereas the
Chryslers had only one.
During his visit to South Africa in 2020, Pierre-Olivier "discovered"
two more ALCO M4 Composite Fireflies. The one shown above is SN 40381 on
display in Bethlehem. One would think that the South Africans would
have chosen unused or low mileage tanks for their post war home defense
forces, but this example is installed with extended end connectors,
perhaps suggesting that it had been issued to a combat unit before the
end of the war in Italy. Note the early configuration E8543 sharp nosed
differential housing with cast in steps. We suspect that the storage
bins at the rear of the hull and turret may have been retrofitted in
Italy as the tank was processed for issue.
It is our theory that some or all of the 300 ALCO M4s manufactured from
October to December 1943 on their last Production Order were large hatch
Composites. Serial Numbers assigned to this P.O. ran from 40305 to
40604. Here we have SN 40554 on display in Bloemfontein. Of the six
surviving examples know at present, this one has the highest serial
number, while the Repotenciado in Olavarria, Argentina has the lowest at
SN 40313. Here we have focused on the lower rear hull since it is
typical of the three in South Africa, showing round Vortox Air Cleaners
(1), double rear tow lugs (2), door stops (3) and fittings for the US
trailer towing pintle (4). These items are not commonly seen on Chrysler
built Composites. The engine access doors of M4 and M4A1 Shermans
included a flange which was welded to the right-side door. For some
reason, this flange is not present on the 3 surviving ALCO built
Fireflies in South Africa, and there are no traces of weld scars on the
right doors. (The ones in South America can't be counted since they had
engine upgrades which changed the original configuration of the lower
rear hull.) In any case, it seems possible that ALCO may not have welded
the flange to the door on some of its late production M4s, but we can
only reference these and 3 welded hull M4s at present.
Another
item observed on the few known ALCO Composites, but not on Chryslers,
is the protective splash around the fire extinguisher housing (circled).
A comparison of
Chrysler-built Composites with the few known ALCO examples reveals some
other differences. The forward edge of the right front
appliqué plate is rounded on the ALCOs but cut on a
straight angle on the Chryslers. The ALCOs feature the so called
"plain" drive sprockets, whereas Chrysler used their own distinctive
sprockets throughout Sherman production. Most Chrysler Composites can
be seen to have the later "upturned" return roller arms. We believe
that ALCO finished Sherman production using the earlier "straight"
return roller arms. As mentioned previously, the "notch" in the sand
shield strip appears to have been exclusive to Chrysler's late
production and remanufactured M4A4s, as well as their M4 Composites. We
suspect that the notched sand shields were adjustable by 11 inches, so
they could fit equally on M4A4s, Composites and M4A6s. In any case, the
few known ALCO Composites have unnotched sand shield strips. Finally,
ALCO left the Sherman program in December 1943. Only 3 companies
remained from 1944 on - Chrysler, Fisher and Pressed Steel Car. They
were mandated to provide a "Loader's Escape Hatch" to their turrets
starting around December 1943. This modification was "Not to
Incorporate" at ALCO, leading us to think that ALCO Composites, however
many there were, were likely built with D50878 low bustle turrets, most
of which would have been of the no pistol port variety. That is to say
that while roughly 700 Chrysler Composites would have been built with
high bustle D78461 turrets, we don't have any evidence thus far of
those on ALCOs.
Fireflies
were also issued to Commonwealth armored units in the Mediterranean Theater of
Operations. No doubt some would have been lost to “wastage” or “attrition,” but
the “15 Army Group AFV Holdings as at 25th June, 1945” states that there were
225 “Sherman 17 pdr” in Italy and Greece. Demobilization would have been
underway, but 173 were still listed “With Formations” at that time. Period
photos show that Commonwealth troops in Italy received a number of Fireflies
converted from M4 Composites. The Polish 4th (Skorpion) Armoured Regiment is
reported to have been issued a dozen M4 based Fireflies in early 1945. One of
the tanks, a Sherman Ic Hybrid named POWAB, was knocked out on April 19, 1945
near Bologna. This M4 Composite has a number of ALCO features, such as the
rounded applique plate on the right front (1) and the "plain"
sprocket (2). Note the step bracket (3), which appears to have been omitted by
Chrysler with the introduction of the gun travel lock. ALCO produced its last
Sherman in December 1943, and it is thought that they ended production with the
low bustle, no pistol port turret, along with suspension units with
"straight" return roller arms (4). Chrysler Composites have a
"notch" in the rear section of the sand shield strip (5), while ALCOs
do not. Photos courtesy of the Polish National Archives.
Lance
Sergeant Michal Krzywoszanski was a fitter
attached to the Regiment's Light Aid Detachment. He took a few photos
of POWAB
as he and his crew salvaged useable parts from the tank. As mentioned
previously, the towing pintle became a standard feature on Shermans by
the middle of 1943, although they don't appear to have been installed
by Chrysler.
ALCO began adding them in April 1943, and one can see the pintle's
faceplate (1)
in the left side photo. In the right side image, note how the
ventilator on the
turret drains to the front (inset). This appears to be consistent with
ALCO
Shermans, whereas with Chryslers, it consistently drains to the rear.
Photos courtesy of Chris Wroblewski.
This photo of POWAB highlights a few other features
not typically seen on Chrysler Composites - the 3-piece engine crank
(1), and the round air cleaners (2). One can also see that this M4 has double
rear towing lugs (3). Photo courtesy of the Polish National Archives.
HOME